- SURPRISE! You're Eating Fukushima Radiation; Bloody Cancerous Tumors in Fish & Seafood
Americans and Canadians have been eating radioactive fish filled with
bloody, cancerous tumors, as a result of contamination with radiation
in the Pacific ocean from the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan.
In March, 2011 an earthquake off the coast of Japan caused a Tsunami
which hit the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant, causing three reactors to
melt down and explode.
Reactors 1 & 3 Explode
|
This is what the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant in Japan looked like Before / After the explosions and Meltdowns.
BEFORE
AFTER
As you may notice in the images above, the Fukushima Daichi Power
Plant is located on the coastline of Japan. Like all coastlines, the
ground slopes toward the ocean. This created a problem that the Tokyo
Electric Power Company (TEPCO) didn't tell anyone about until a full
YEAR after the disaster took place:
Ground water, flowing from
inland, was seeping beneath the blown-up rectors, coming into contact
with the melted-down reactor cores, becoming highly radioactive, then
flowing into the Pacific Ocean. 300 Ton of this radioactive water has been seeping into the Pacific Ocean
EVERY DAY
since March 15, 2011. Nothing has stopped it and the flow continues to
this very day, October 31, 2015. Here's how it is taking place:
TEPCO wanted to build a "freeze wall" (shown in the graphic above) to
freeze the ground and the water, to stop the flow. They tried. They
failed. The radiation and heat coming from the melted down reactor
cores - which melted through the reactor and melted into the ground - is
making the water too hot. They can't freeze it. There is no "wall" to
stop the flow!
The flow of radioactive water into the Pacific is contaminating and
killing sea life. Fish caught locally near the power plant and out in
the deep sea, have
all
tested positive for radiation contamination. Other fish, Shrimp, clams
and such, caught hundreds of miles offshore, have also tested 100%
positive for radiation contamination. In fact, of 15 Blue-Fin Tuna
caught off the coast of California, 100% tested positive for radioactive
substances!
Hundreds-of-thousands of these sea creatures have already died from
the radiation and millions more are sick and dying to this day.
People who consume this seafood are ALSO getting contaminated by radiation.
The prevailing ocean currents off the east coast of Japan are well
documented by Oceanographers. Here is what the prevailing ocean currents
look like:
Generally speaking, two surface currents — one from the south, called
the Kuroshio, and one from the north, called the Oyashio — meet just
off the coast of Japan at about 40 degrees north latitude. The currents
merge to form the North Pacific current and surge eastward. Fukushima
lies at 37 degrees north latitude. Thousands of miles later, the
currents hit an upwelling just off the western coast of the United
States and split. One, the Alaska current, turns north up the coast
toward British Columbia and Southeast Alaska. The other, the California
current, turns south and heads down the western seaboard of the U.S.
These currents are spreading the radioactive material from Japan.
As of June, 2015, the radiation in the Pacific Ocean reached the US West Coast;
the seafood you've been eating from the Pacific ocean is loaded with Cesium-137 and Strontium-90. Both radioactive. Strontium-90
mimics calcium. It ends up getting deposited in human bones, where the
radiation wreaks havoc with bone marrow, causing bone cancers and blood
cancers like Leukemia.
The radiation in the fish is so terrible that wild-caught Alaskan
Salmon, Pacific Herring and Canadian white fish are being found bloody,
with cancerous tumors throughout their bodies.
The migration patterns of Pacific salmon explains why. The graphic below shows the migration patterns of Salmon:
In a nutshell, Salmon ride the Alaska current and follow its curve
past Sitka, Yakutat, Kodiak and the Aleutian Islands. Most often, it’s
the Chinook, Coho and Sockeye Salmon migration patterns that range
farthest. Chum and Pink Salmon seem to stay closer to home. Regardless
of how far out each salmon species ventures into the Pacific, each fish
hitches a ride back to its home rivers and spawning grounds on the North
Pacific current,
the same one pulling the Fukushima radioactive materials eastward.
We all know too much exposure to nuclear waste can cause cancer. And
many understand that certain chemicals, such as cesium-137 and
strontium-90, contained in said waste products can accumulate in fish by
being deposited in bones and muscle permanently.
Alaska salmon as well as all types of Pacific seafood (Shrimp, clams,
scallops, squid, etc.) are being tainted with radioactive
contamination.
So are the people who consume them.
What do you think happens to people who eat radiation-contaminated
food? Worse, what happens to people who eat cancerous tumors without
knowing what they are?
The government and the nuclear power industry claim we have nothing to worry about. When you see the photos below, you may want
decide for yourself if they're telling the truth.
According to the Local Environmental Observers (LEO) Network in
Hydaburg, Alaska, they have found strange growths in the flesh or meat
of salmon. "We were fishing for Cohos (silver salmon) at the mouth of
the Hydaburg River with line and reel." said Brian Holter, Jr. who said
that eight fish were filled up inside with strange growths that were
either white or pink in color. "On the outside the fish looked fine. The
growths looked kind of like individual little salmon eggs, and about
the same size. their people were seeing the same kind of growths in
their fish as well." he continued. This is what the tumors inside three
separate Salmon looked like:
Cancerous Tumors in Salmon
The map below will give readers an understanding of the proximity of
Hydaburg, Alaska to the Fukushima, Japan disaster site, to demonstrate
how far the effects of Fukushima radiation have traveled in the four
years since the disaster began:
Other volunteers from LEO have come across even more disturbing
cancerous tumors and bloody lesions on fish. According to another LEO
volunteer, Sam Kunaknana, in Nuiqsut, Alaska, for the past few months
they have been catching sick fish on Nigliq Channel and upstream from
Nigliq Channel to the Colville River. The fish have had bloody lesions
and tumors on them.
Fish w/Lesions:
Sadly, the images above aren't nearly the worst of it. Other
fishermen and even Marine Biologists have caught other fish showing
classic signs of radiation-caused cancerous tumors. "In all the years
I’ve been fishing I never caught any fish like this. Caught 3 more sick
fish with same markings and this time one had some kind of growths
coming out from its mouth. Most people in our community eat this fish."
Sam Kunaknana continued.
While there is no way to tell exactly where in the Pacific Ocean
these fish have been, one thing is for certain - they're ALL from the
Pacific Ocean. Yet numerous "scientists" have repeatedly stated that
"dilution is the solution" for the Fukushima pollution. These
"scientists" say the Pacific Ocean is so big and has so much water, the
radiation spewing from Fukushima can't possibly be bad enough to affect
humans. The pictures in this story seem to prove those "scientists"
wrong.
Certainly, the Pacific Ocean is huge. Yet as the map above shows,
distance from Fukushima did not seem to matter with the fish caught near
Hydaburg, Alaska.
The map below, shows the location of the other LEO volunteer, Sam
Kunaknana, in Nuiqsut, Alaska, thousands of miles farther away from
Fukushima than Hyanburg. In fact, Nuiqsut, Alaska is about as far north
as one can get from Fukushima, but the radiation has gotten there too.
Nuiqsut, AK Map:
We've all heard for years that sharks don't get cancer. Well, when
they swim around the Pacific Ocean nowadays, the radiation is so
terrible that
even sharks are getting cancer!
Recently, researchers in Australia noticed a large tumor protruding
from the mouth of a great white shark, as well as another mass on the
head of a bronze whaler shark. The tumor on the Great White was a
historic first.
The great white's tumor measured 1 foot (30 centimeters) long and 1
foot wide, according to a study describing the tumors published online
in the Journal of Fish Diseases. "This was a very unusual sight as
we have never before seen a white shark with tumors,"
said Rachel Robbins, a study co-author and shark biologist at the Fox
Shark Research Foundation, near Adelaide, in southern Australia.
In another historic first, this Coral fish from the Great Barrier
Reef in Australia has been found with . . . skin cancer along its head
and face; exactly the type which affects . . . humans! The
_only_ explanation for a fish getting human-like skin cancer is exposure to radiation.
It's not just fish that are showing the effects of radiation
poisoning. Other creatures in the sea AND on land, are showing the signs
as well.
Sea Lions
Star Fish - are supposed to have FIVE legs. The shape of a star. Look what radiation did to this one:
Tuna
Walruses
Shrimp
According to the Journal of Wildlife Diseases, scientists from United
States Geological Survey (USGS) and Alaska Department of Fish &
Game, Jan 2015: Alopecia
(hair loss) has been observed
in several marine mammal species… From 2012, we observed an alopecia
syndrome in polar bears from the southern Beaufort Sea of Alaska that
presented as bilaterally asymmetrical loss of guard hairs and thinning
of the undercoat around the head, neck, and shoulders, which, in severe
cases, was accompanied by
exudation and crusted skin lesions. Alopecia was observed in 49 (3.45%) of the bears sampled during 1,421 captures [peaking in] 2012 (28%)
Polar Bear (balding snout and hair loss at neck)
Some have said that there are explanations other than radiation for
these ailments. Certainly that might be worthy of consideration. Yet,
how many of these so called "ailments" can cross-species? I
t is not just fish being affected. Mammals are, too.
Fish, Seals, Walruses and even Polar Bears; ALL of them are suffering
bloody lesions, some suffering external tumors and others are losing
their fur - hair loss is one of the first signs of radiation poisoning,
even in humans.
US GOVERNMENT HAS DONE -- NOTHING
The 'federal government' of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has done
absolutely NOTHING to test for radiation in the Pacific Ocean. Nothing.
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service confirm they "have not tested for radiation and have no
plans to do so in the future."
A FOIA request encompassing the entire Department of the Interior,
via the Office of the Secretary, resulted in being told "The office of
the Secretary does not have any records relating to your request."
The Federal Aviation Administration FOIA response was "FAA is not involved."
The FOIA response from the Nuclear Regulatory Agency was "NRC does not conduct the types of tests in your FOIA request."
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) replied "We do not conduct such tests."
The Environmental Protection Agency replied, "Please understand that
these reports take time to create. Report 154 is currently under review
at our laboratory and will be published once the review is complete."
(That report is over a year old and they still haven't reviewed it
yet???)
The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
replied they want $7,098.84 to fill the request. Their charges are as
follows:
Action Officer
|
Estimated number of hours
|
Hourly Salary
|
Benefits @16%
|
Hourly Cost
|
Total Cost
|
Senior Scientist 40 = 38
|
38
|
$74.47
|
$11.92
|
$86.39
|
$3,282.82
|
Senior Scientist
|
20
|
$81.10
|
$12.98
|
$94.08
|
$1,881.60
|
Senior Scientist
|
4
|
$81.03
|
$12.97
|
$94.00
|
$376.00
|
Senior Professional
|
2
|
$67.66
|
$10.83
|
$78.49
|
$156.98
|
Senior Professional
|
16
|
$75.51
|
$12.08
|
$87.59
|
$1,401.44
|
| |
80
|
|
|
|
$7,098.84
|
So, there you have it. For four+ years, the Fukushima Nuclear Power
Plant disaster has been spewing deadly radioactive material into the
Pacific Ocean and for three years, the agencies above have done nothing.
Without admitting they have done nothing, NOAA wants $7,098.84 to
merely LOOK to see if
they have any records relating to a request! In the meantime, fish from
the Pacific Ocean are contaminated with -- and dying from -- Fukushima
radiation and that means the radiation is in the seafood that YOU, your
family, maybe even your cats and dogs are eating.
The next time you hear anyone from 'government' say "We have no
reason to believe there is any radiation hazard" bear in mind it is
because
they are not testing for it. That's why they have no information . . . . . and . . . . conveniently . . . . "no reason to believe" there is any danger.
Yet government did take -some- action with respect to radiation;
they raised the definition of "safe" exposure! Yes, you read that
correctly.
- A nearly 1000-fold increase for exposure to strontium-90;
- A 3000 to 100,000-fold hike for exposure to iodine-131; and
- An almost 25,000 rise for exposure to radioactive nickel-63.
The new radiation guidelines would also
allow long-term cleanup thresholds thousands of times more lax than
anything EPA has ever judged safe in the past.
And see
this.
Indeed, some government scientists and media shills are now
“reexamining” old studies that show that radioactive substances like
plutonium cause cancer to argue that they help
prevent cancer.
It is not just bubbleheads like
Ann Coulter saying this. Government scientists from the
Pacific Northwest National Laboratories and
pro-nuclear hacks like
Lawrence Solomon are saying this.
In other words, this is a concerted propaganda campaign to cover up
the severity of a major nuclear accident by raising acceptable levels of
radiation and saying that a little radiation is good for us.
As of October 30, 2015, (yesterday) the
Japan Times reported
that the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has detected radiation at
9.4 Sieverts outside Reactor containment vessel #2. This amount of
radiation is
absolutely deadly to anyone exposed for 45 minutes.
This latest development has scuttled TEPCO's plans to decommission
what's left of that exploded reactor because no one can be near enough
to it to disassemble the wreckage.
If this situation wasn't so pathetic, it would be laughable. Folks on
the west coast of North America might want to consider their outdoor
activities. If YOU go swimming in the same water these fish swam in, YOU
could come out looking like they look! As for everyone else,
head-on-out to your local supermarket or restaurant and eat-up! The
"government' says it's safe and they _never_ lie!
