Other Hoaxes Zionist Terror — 04 December 2015
Updated, Dec. 4, 2015
Make no mistake about it the San Bernardino gun control hoax is a scam to the extreme. This is made glaringly clear by the staging perpetrated in the attempt to create realism, where a car is show shot-up and where, then, what appear to be corpses are shown on the pavement.
There can be no doubt that the car was shot up. Yet, there is no evidence to any degree that the official story is real, that this was a shoot-out by law enforcement against ‘terrorists’ on the run. If this was the case, why are there no skid marks? How could the car come to a stop in such a straight line? There is no evidence of breaking or skidding of any kind.
What is that trash can doing there? How did it get there? Surely, the SWAT moles have things better to do than to place so strategically that receptacle. Even so, what is happening about the SWAT vehicle? How is this representative of an emergency circumstance? Furthermore, where are the dead people, the man and his wife? They cannot be seen anywhere? Did they put them in the receptacle?
In fact, there is no emergency here of any kind. Moreover, it appears that there are people already inside the car and none of them are dead.
What is going on, here? There was no red matter to be seen previously. How did it get there? Furthermore, what is the purpose of all those white marks? Who painted that fake blood on the pavement?
It was clearly not there before. If the man was shot dead in the car, he would have stopped bleeding.
That red matter was clearly added after the initial staging photo, categorically proven here. There can be no doubt that this is a hoax. The placement of white markers next to the fake blood and the obviously painted red matter on the pavement are hard proof of the nature of this as nothing other than a fraud.
If the entity was bleeding, why is there no trail of blood? Why is there no arterial spurting?
It couldn’t bleed no matter how many times it was shot. That’s because rather than a human it is nothing other than a dummy, a reticulated dapper cadaver. That dapper cadaver is of the fake Anglo-Saxon type, too light-skinned (that is latexed) to be the man in question. The dummy has been painted with fake blood.
Clearly, this is a dummy and nothing else. There can be no doubt about this fact. For certain this is not an image of Farooq and/or his wife. Notice the rectangular pattern for the painted-on fake blood. Also, notice the color; it’s fake for sure.
What in God’s name is this? It surely can’t be human. Did it come delivered in that massive bag? Are those its feet? If soe, what are they doing up in the air? It’s a freak show, make no mistake about it, one that would make P.T. Barnum proud.
These are the two people who are lying (fake) dead on the pavement? Who finds that plausible?
Did he bleach his skin before deciding to participate in the hoax?
Or, was it this man all along, and they just got it wrong, a light-skinned Qatari individual?
CAIR seems to indicate that it really happened, putting a relative on the podium. If it is real, then, why is the woman on the far edge of the imagery seen to be smirking?
Regarding the (fake) shooter what kind of image is this? What is that cut-line doing next to his neck? What is the matter with the poor man’s thumb.
It truly is a freak show, and there can be no way that could be a real hand. This gives the phrase having a green thumb a new meaning.
Even so, he does seem to be a real person. In this selfie it is possible to seen his image in reverse in the mirror behind.
How much was Farooq paid to participate in this scam? Where is he, now? That’s not him on the pavement, which is readily seen by anyone who would consider the facts at-hand:
This really is a dummy, with mere silicone and latex as its substance rather than actual human flesh. This is indisputable evidence that the San Bernardino ‘mass shooting’ is nothing other than a hoax and a fraud, a scam to the most extreme degree: rather than a false flag a mere hoax, though a treacherous one meant to spread corruption in the land.
An image is also shown, here. How did he get from the side of the curb to the center of the road without there being a blood trail to follow? Also, does that red matter look nothing like real blood but, rather, like fake blood, the type of tempura paint?
The red matter next to the vehicle has no correlation with that seen, here, of the imagery next to the curb. It is believed, however, that this is a live Farooq and that he is an element in the staging.
Here is what one of our posters had to say about the arch-phony staging and hoaxing:
The ENTIRE event is a gigantic fraud upon the world.
Why isn’t the media asking ONE basic question: “where is the female deceased?”
In its futile attempt to make the event believable, the media’s version contains elements that is very simple to disprove. Take for example the following sentences:
“According to police, the couple donned themselves with assault rifles…”
“According to some reports, the duo had GoPro cameras strapped to their body armor…”
Then, there was supposedly a “violent shootout on a RESIDENTIAL street in Redlands.”
All of this is part of the script, all part of the phony fake show. The phrase “according to police” is vague and ambiguous. Which police? Who said they had GoPro cameras? Where is the evidence? If there was a violent shootout, where are witnesses who can verify with their call phone cameras?
In these scripted events, the media first sells the world on the foundation lie, as in the foundation part of a pyramid. This is the base lie that must be accepted by the masses as fact. The base lie here can be summarized in a few sentences:
“Shooters storm a holiday party, killing 14 and injuring 21. One male and one female, both Muslim, storm off in a black SUV, killed by police in a shootout. Third suspect detained.”
Once the sheep have been duped by the foundation lie, then the media can provide an unlimited amount of ornaments to support its foundation. Ornaments are just additional lies. However, when it becomes abundantly clear that the foundation lie is exposed, then the ENTIRE pyramid of lies collapses.
EVERY statement made by a supposed “witness” on television is HEARSAY and thus not admissible in court. But there will be no witnesses called to court and provide testimony under penalty of perjury, because there will be no jury trial, since all the fake shooters are fake dead.
The people of San Bernadino attending the vigil are just brain dead sheep who blindly accept what they see on their television sets.
Why doesn’t the media go and speak to the supposed victims at the hospital who are only “wounded” and thus would be able to give a first hand account on what happened. Again, where is the cell phone footage, where is the CCTV footage of the SUV arriving and/or escaping the scene from the nearby traffic cameras?
The scam remains the same:
1. Fake shooting
2. Fake wounded
3. Fake dead
4. Fake relatives
It’s just a PHONY FAKE SHOW, where NOBODY DIED and NOBODY GOT HURT.
No comments:
Post a Comment